Blog 11 - Night and Day

I chose “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” because this poem really touched me. When I lost my father I felt the same way Dylan Thomas did. I wanted my father to fight for his life, hoping that he would win. Unfortunately it did not happen. As time past, I realized it is just a part of life and that is, in part, what this poem is about. 

Dylan Thomas’ poem “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” is a perfect example of a villanelle. A villanelle is a very structured and detailed format. Thomas uses this format to help create a very strong and meaningful statement. “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” follows every single guideline of a villanelle, plus some structure of its own. This poem contains 19 lines of five tercets with a final quatrain. Each tercet provides a strong example of the general message about death. This is where Thomas adds structure of his own. Thomas creates all nineteen lines using 10 syllables in each. I did not see, in the definition, anything about the amount of syllables. I believe Thomas added this just to make a stronger poem, which then makes a stronger statement. The first line of each starts of with a statement about different types of men. The beginnings are, “wise men,” “good men,” “wild men,” “grave men,” and “you, my father.” It shows that death happens to any and all men. It is going to happen no matter what. The second line of each tercet provides a metaphor of what the men have gone through in life or what they are going through on their death bed. Thomas uses, “burn and rave at close of day,” “forked no lighting,” “danced in a green bay,” “And learn, too late,” “blaze like meteors,” and “curse, bless.” All of these lines show how men have lived their life but, no matter what, their life is coming to an end. Fighting death, for every one, is a curse and a blessing at the same time. Then the third line of each stanza repeats the same two closing sentences, alternating each time. The closing sentences are “Do not go gentle into that good night” and “Rage, rage against the dying of the light,” which come from the first and third line of the first stanza. Both of these lines are also repeated in the concluding quatrain. The guidelines of repeating these lines set a very strong message. In this case, the message is “die fighting.” The definition of a villanelle also states that it can only have two rhymes throughout the entire poem. These two rhymes are “night” and “day,” which come from the end of the first and second lines of the first stanza. In this poem Thomas compares “night and day” with “life and death.” This also helps repeat the message that everyone will eventually die. Regardless of how or why, Thomas says that death should not be accepted. Everyone should fight for their life. 

Blog 10 - A Dance Or A Beating?

Hallelujah, I found a poem that I like. Probably because I thought it was a terrible poem, but then realized it could be a really happy one. So, it think I like it because I was so relieved about the different meaning. There are two different ways to interpret “My Papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke. It can be about a father bonding with his son or a father beating his son. So, lets start from the beginning and work our way down the poem. The first line, “The whiskey on your breath could make a small boy dizzy” (1-2). This can mean that the father just had one drink to unwind after work. Whiskey does have a strong nasty smell that can just make a small child dizzy. But, it can also mean that the father came home wasted and reeks of whiskey. The next line is “But I hung on like death; Such waltzing was not easy” (3-4). The father could just be a clumsy dancer so the son has to hold on to keep up with is father. Or, the son held onto his father because he did not want to restrain from a beating to make it worse. The fifth line says, “We romped until the pans slid from the kitchen shelf” (5-6). Romped is a word meaning rough play. The father’s dancing could be so clumsy that

he his running into things, causing them to fall over. Although, romped could be used to try to camouflage exactly how violent the father is. The pans could be falling because the father is beating his son. Next, the poems says, “My mother’s countenance could not unfrown itself” (7-8). The mother could have been frowning and without action for two different reasons as well. She could have been upset that the father was making the son all wired up before bedtime and making a mess of the house. However, she did not want to interrupt their bonding time. Yet, if the father is beating the son then the mother could be too afraid to interrupt, especially if the father is drunk. The next two lines state, “The hand that held my wrist was battered on one knuckle” (9-10). The fathers hand could be “battered” from a hard day at work, if his job requires a lot of labor. Otherwise, if the father
is an alcoholic he might get into a lot of fights, causing his knuckles to be mess up. The 11th and 12th lines of the poem are “At every step you missed my right ear scraped a buckle.” This implies that the son’s height is at the level as his father’s waist. The boy could be standing on his father’s feet so they can dance together. This way, if the father misses a step, the son’s ear scraps against his belt buckle. However, the father could be using his belt to beat his son. If the father is drunk, he could stumble and miss what he is aiming for, causing the belt to scrape his ear instead. Then the poem says, “You beat time on my head with a palm caked hard by dirt” (13-14). This could mean the father is trying to keep the rhythm of the dance by playing the beat on his son’s head. Or, some would take it as the father is literally beating his son’s head. The father’s hands are probably dirty from work. Finally, the last two lines are, “Then waltzed me off to bed still clinging to your shirt” (15-16). This can either be the father is actually dancing with his son to his bedroom, or the father is beating him away. So, the son would continue to hold his shirt in order to keep balance to finish dancing or because he is too afraid to move away. To summarize these two meanings; The father had a drink to unwind and is dancing and bonding with his son before bedtime. Or, the father is an alcoholic and came home and beat his son before bedtime. It is very interesting to think that this one poem can have two completely different meanings. Which way did you interpret the poem?

Blog 9 - Who Knew Poems Provide So Much Imagery?

     The imagery in John Masefield’s “Cargoes” and Wilfred Owen’s “Anthem for Doomed Youth” are different in a couple of ways. Masefield describes a few different types of images, however he mainly describes pleasant visual imagery. Although, towards the end the imagery becomes unappealing. Whereas Owen mainly describes sounds. He uses pleasant metaphors to describe something that is actually a horrific sound. Towards the end, the images of the poem change from sounds to sight. 

     In the first stanza of “Cargoes” John Masefield gives the sense of sound, sight, smell, and taste. He writes about “apes and peacocks” (4). This makes me imagine the different sounds of the animals, along with the sight of a colorful peacock. My favorite image is of the “sandalwood, cedarwood” (5). The smell of the fresh natural wood. Then he goes to the “sweet white wine” (5). This makes me imagine the taste of sweet dessert wine. All of these images make me feel relaxed and peaceful. Including when Masefield writes, “rowing home to haven in sunny Palestine” (2). I am imagining the smell of the ocean and the feel of the warm sun. In the second stanza Masefield describes mostly visual images. He writes:

          With a cargo of diamonds,

          Emeralds, amethysts,

          Topaz, and cinnamon, and gold moidores. (8-10)

All of these descriptions make me imagine all the luxuries of royalty. The beautiful sparkling jewels and shinning gold coins. Despite all of the wonderful descriptions, in the third stanza Masefield writes about some unpleasant images as well. In the first line he writes about the “Dirty British coaster with a salt-caked smoke stack” (11). I am now picturing a huge dirty ship that is polluting the air with tones of nasty smoke. He continues to write:

  With a cargo of Tyne coal,

Road-rails, pig-lead,

Firewood, iron-ware, and cheap tin trays. (13-15)

This completely changes the entire poem for me. Now I am just imagining everything wrong with commercialized shipping; nasty smog, dirty coal, poisonous lead, and possible oil polluting the water. 

     In “Anthem for Doomed Youth,” Wilfred Owen starts off with “What passing-bells for these who die” (1). At first I was imagining the lovely sound of church bells. However, my mind quickly changed in the first line. He continues to write, “those who die as cattle” (1). My mind goes from a peaceful funeral, to a horrific death. I picture men standing in the front line of war, dropping just like cattle. Then in the second line Owen writes, “Only the monstrous anger of the guns” (2). Come to find out there aren’t bells at all, just loud gun shots. This is not a pretty poem so far. Owen again uses something pleasant to describe an awful situation. He writes, “The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells” (7). He is describing the sound of the explosions used as the church choir for mourning death. Towards the end Owen’s images change from sound to sight. He writes, “What candles may be held to speed them all? Not in the hands of boys, but in their eyes” (9-10). There are only tears to shine in place of candle light. So instead of these boys receiving a nice funeral and time to mourn, the war continues over their dyeing bodies. I don’t like these images at all!

Blog 8 - A Wide Variety of Poems

     The poem that I was drawn to the most was “Here a Pretty Baby Lies” by Robert Herrick. At first I thought it was a very cute and sweet little poem. I was picturing a newborn baby laying in their crib, their mother hovering over to sing quiet lullabies, while the rest of the house remain silent. Of course, I was shocked when I read the last line. Herrick wrote, “Th’easy earth that covers her” (4). Come to find out the baby is actually dead. I was attracted to this poem because it has deep meaning and feeling behind it. I just wish it had a happy ending of course. I liked how it was written, although it is too short. I like that it rhymes and it is very easy to understand. I felt like it was clear and straight to the point. I like that it did not take me an hour to figure it out.

snow on blackboard

  I also enjoyed “Schoolsville” by Billy Collins. I like how he uses materials in a classroom as metaphors for the environment outside. Collins writes, “chalk dust flurrying down in winter, nights dark as a blackboard” (5-6). He is saying the the chalk is like snow and the board is the color of the night sky. I like how he says that he forgets the student’s names but he remembers their actions. He writes, “The girl who signed her papers in lipstick” (17). Of course everyone remembers the girls who signs her name with lipstick but no one remembers what that girl’s name is. He also talks about how the students group together, and I completely agree with him. Collins writes, “The A’s stroll along with other A’s. The D’s honk whenever they pass another D” (22-23). Students that are grouped together tend to get the same grades in school or have the same interests, such as creative writing. I guess I like this poem because it is something that I can relate to so it is easier for me to understand it. I also like how it has some humor to it. It’s a playful poem. 

     I’m going to be honest and say that I don’t really like poems all together. So all of the other poems were not appealing at all. I do not understand what they are trying to say. The metaphors confuse me. I hate how they don’t rhyme. It’s like a puzzle that I can’t figure out. If I feel like I can’t relate to the poem, then I am not interested. I am more of a story kind of person. Just say what you mean and get to the point. Why all of these secret meanings? This last part of the class is not going to be easy :(

Blog 7 - The Struggle of Parenting

 Troy tries his best to be a good father to his children. He wants to be better than his father and wants his children to be better off than he ended up to be. However, in a way, Troy is like his father. He gives tough love and pushes his family away from him. Troy only thinks of himself and what he wants. Troy is hardest on Cory because he sees himself in Cory and wants him to do better.  

Even though Troy does not like his father, his attitude towards his family is the same. When talking about his father, Troy says, “he was trapped and I think he knew it. But I’ll say this for him... he felt a responsibility toward us.” (1.4.105). Troy feels that same way towards his own children. Troy tells Cory, “it’s my duty to take care of you. I owe a responsibility to you!... I ain’t got to like you” (1.3.107). Troy feels as though he just has to lead his children down the right path. He does not have to show them any emotion or be considerate towards them. 

Troy is a little more lenient with Lyons. Troy does not agree with Lyons trying to become a musician. He lectures Lyons on not having a real job or money of his own. Troy tells Lyons he will not give him a dime. He says, “I’ll die and go to hell and play blackjack with the devil before I give you ten dollars.” (1.1.113). However, Troy let him take the money anyway. He still supports Lyons when he needs it. 

On the other hand, Troy does not give Cory what he really wants. This is because Cory just wants to play sports, just like Troy did. Troy says that sports didn’t bring him any good. So he doesn’t want Cory involved in sports. When Troy is talking about Cory he says, “I don’t want him to be like me! I want him to move as far away from my life as he can get” (1.3.111). As the play goes on Troy and Cory grow father and father apart. Eventually Troy messes up Cory’s chances of becoming a football player. Cory gets so upset that he tells Troy, “You just an old man” (2.4.78). Meaning that Cory says Troy has made nothing of himself. He is no one special and he has no authority over anyone. Troy is just another old man to him. It escalates so much that Cory moves out and ends up joining the marines. 

Troy’s life ends without making things right with his son. At first, Cory does not even want to go to his dad’s funeral. His talks about how he feels towards Troy with his mother. She tells Cory, “Not going to your daddy’s funeral ain’t gonna make you a man” (2.5.72). She also tells Cory that he is a lot like his father, if he likes it or not. The situation was never resolved between the two of them. However, Cory realizes that he needs to resolve it on his own and he ends up going to the funeral. 

Blog 6 - Full of Sorrow

        Most of the deaths in William Shakespeare's “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” are caused by Claudius, the new King of Denmark. Although Hamlet kills a couple of people, it is only by mistake. Claudius, with the assistance of others, tore apart the entire empire.  Claudius is a very greedy man who only cares about possessing power. He kills every one who is a threat to take the throne away from him. He continues to kill until, eventually he is the cause of his own death.  

  Hamlet kills Polonius, thinking that it was the King, Claudius. Later on, Hamlet is face to face with Laertes and tells him it was an accident. Hamlet says, “Give me your pardon sir, I have done you wrong” (5.2.209). Hamlet is asking for forgiveness for killing his father. Hamlet is also the reason that Guildenstern and Rosencrantz die. However, Hamlet does not kill them himself. Hamlet also states, “they did make love to this employment” (5.2.57). He is saying that these two men brought it upon themselves. It is not Hamlet’s intent to kill anyone. 

  Unlike Claudius, he intends to kill anyone in his way. Of course it all starts when Claudius kills his brother, the former King of Denmark. The next person that Claudius means to kill is Hamlet. Claudius goes as far as to create a plan on how to kill him. In (4.7.152) Claudius says, “Should have a back or second that might hold.” Meaning, he creates a back-up plan to be certain that Hamlet will die. However, many others die along the way. 

  Laertes dies because the Claudius uses him to kill Hamlet. Claudius tells Laertes that Hamlet killed his father on purpose. Therefore, getting Laertes to concede to his plan. Even when Laertes forgives Hamlet and starts to go easy on him, Claudius is still persistent. Claudius says, “since he is bettered, we have therefore odds” (5.2.246). He pressures Laertes into continuing the fight with Hamlet. Resulting in the death of both of them. 

  The most shocking death is the death of Gertrude, the Queen. “The queen carouses to thy fortune” (5.2.273). She accidentally drinks the poison from Hamlet’s cup. The most upsetting part about this is that when it happens Claudius doesn’t try to help her at all. He actually tells everyone, “She sounds to see them bleed” (5.2.292). He is trying to convince everyone that she fainted at the sight of blood. Shows how much he really cares about his wife. 
  Lastly, Claudius is the fault of his own death. Hamlets says to Claudius, “Drink off this potion: is thy union here? Follow my mother” (5.2.309). Hamlet is so upset that he forces Claudius to drink the poison to die the way his mother does. Since Claudius poures the poison into his own throat, he is the one that kills himself. Even while Laertes is dyeing he says, “the king, the king’s to blame” (5.2.303). At this point everyone is aware of Claudius’ true character and knows all of the sorrows that he causes in Denmark.

Blog 5 - Hamlet Gone Wild

 Hamlet is upset for many different reasons. He is of course upset that his father died. However, most of his anger comes from his uncle and his mother. He feels betrayed from those he felt closest to. Now he just wants revenge. 

Hamlet is upset about the death of his father, and his feelings show. His mother tells him, “Good Hamlet cast thy nighted colour off” (1.2.68). His mother explains to Hamlet that death is natural and Hamlet needs to move on. Hamlet is upset with his mother at this point. He is already mad that she remarried so fast. He is especially upset that she married her former husband’s brother (it is also looked down on because it is considered incest). Furthermore, she talks to Hamlet like he should not even be upset with anything that is happening.

He is also upset with is uncle because he stepped in without even speaking to Hamlet about it. Claudius even said to Hamlet, “You are the most immediate to our throne” (1.2.109). So Claudius knows he is in the wrong but does not care. He just wants to be King. Claudius betrayed Hamlet and his father. 

Hamlet becomes more upset when he talks to the ghost. The ghost tells Hamlet, “I am thy father’s spirit” (1.5.10). The ghost also tells Hamlet, “Upon my secure hour thy uncle stole with juice of cursed hebona in a vail, and in the porches of my ears did pour” (1.5.61-63). This tells us that its is Claudius who kills him so he can take over the throne. His father’s spirit only appears at night and is left to burn and suffer during the day. Therefore, Hamlet wants to fight for his father and will seek revenge on Claudius. 

Polonius tells the king and queen that Hamlet is mad over the love he has for Ophelia. He tells the queen, “that he is mad ‘tis true” (2.2.97). So Polonius sets up a meeting so they can spy on him. However, Hamlet is really upset because he wants revenge on his uncle. It is not very easy to kill the king and Hamlet doesn’t really want to kill anyone. He believes that killing is a sin and he does not want to go to hell. So Hamlet’s plan is to create a play about it. He wants to put on the play for Claudius to watch. Hamlet speaks about Claudius when he says, “wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the king.” (2.2.580). He believes that if his uncle sees this play, that he will feel guilty and come forward. 

Blog 4 - All You Need Is Love

     In the story “The Lady with the Dog”, Anton Chekhov shares that every one has one true love . True love cannot be found in just any body. Chekhov used Dmitri Dmitritch Gurov and Anna Sergeyevna to show two different characters that are unhappy until they find love in each other. They are both married but do not love their spouse at all. “It was clear that Anna was very unhappy.” (Chekhov, 469) In the beginning Gurov does not even believe in love. He thinks that no matter who he is with, they will still get sick of each other after time. “every intimacy, which at first so agreeably diversifies life and appears a light and charming adventure, inevitably grows into a regular problem of extreme intricacy, and in the long run the situation becomes unbearable.” (Chekhov, 467) He cheated on his wife numerous times thinking nothing is going to change. He thinks of Anna as just another woman. It is not until Gurov goes back home that he realizes he loves her. “He would pace a long time about his room, remembering it all and smiling” (Chekhov, 472) Anna thought of Gurov often as well. “I have thought of nothing but you all the time; I live only in the thought of you.” (Chekhov, 474) When Gurov finds out about their feelings for each other, his attitude toward love completely changes. “And only now when his head was grey he had fallen properly, really in love - for the first time in his life.” (Chekhov, 476) Gurov even has 3 children with his wife. “He was sick of his children” (Chekhov, 472) This shows that no one can force themselves to love someone else, even if they have a family together. There is only one true love for every one person. 

     “The Horse Dealer’s Daughter” gives the same message that the heart wants what it wants. In the beginning Mabel Pervin is rude toward everyone, including Dr. Jack Fergusson. “Mabel looked at him with her steady, dangerous eyes, that always made him uncomfortable, unsettling his superficial ease.” (Lawrence, 480) Jack thinks of Mabel as just another patient. “He had never thought of loving her. He had never wanted to love her.” (Lawrence, 484) Yet, he risks his own life to save hers. “He could not swim, and was afraid.” (Lawrence, 482) but he goes in the pond anyway. After he brings her to the house he cannot stop looking at her or leave her side. “There was another desire in him. And she seemed to hold him.” (Lawrence, 483) He realizes at the end of the story that he is in love with her. “And again, from the pain of his breast, he knew how he loved her. He went and bent to kiss her, gently, passionately, with his heart’s painful kiss.” (Lawrence, 486) So, although he had no intention on ever being with her. The true feelings of his heart came out in the end. Love can only come from what the heart wants. This story also gives the thought that life is not complete without love. Mabel “waded slowly into the water” (Lawrence, 482) to commit suicide. However, in the end she is ready to start a new life with Jack. She just wanted to take care of him right away. She gets dry clothes for him, “she had on her best dress,” (Lawrence, 486) and she is ready to make him some tea. Now that she has love in her life she is ready to live again.

Blog 3 - Irony

     Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” is full of irony. It is ironic that Mrs. Louise Mallard is young but dies from heart failure. “She was young, with a fair, calm face.” (Chopin,338) “When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease - of joy that kills.” (Chopin, 339) It is ironic that the sky resembles her situation. “There were patched of blue sky showing here and there through the clouds that had met and piled one above the other in the west facing her window.” (Chopin, 338) There is the huge dark moment of death, however there is still light shinning through, and that is her freedom. It is ironic that her husband, Brently Mallard, supposedly dies in a train accident, but Brently he was not even on the train. “He had been far from the scene of the accident, and did not even know there had been one.” (Chopin, 338) The most ironic part was not only that Louise dies instead of Brently. But that Louise is soaking in her freedom and rejoicing all of her wonderful time to come. She is thinking about the long life that she is going to live all be herself. “She was drinking in a very elixir of life through that open window. Her fancy was running a riot along those days ahead of her. Spring days, and summer days, and all sorts of days that would be her own. She breathed a quick prayer that life might be long.” (Chopin, 338) Her dreams are interrupted by her husband walking through the front door. Instead of living that long, wonderful, free life, her life actually ends at that moment. 

     There is also irony in “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe. It is kind of hard to follow. It seems as though the narrator of the story is imagining that his old friend, Fortunato, is with him on the trip down to the vault. Although, it is possible that he kills Fortunato while they are in the vault. While on the trip the narrator is worried about Fortunato’s health and tries to do what is best for him. “We will go back; your health is precious. You are rich, respected, admired, beloved; you are happy, as once I was. You are a man to be missed. For me it is no matter. We will go back; you will be ill, and I cannot be responsible.” (Poe, 526) It is ironic that the narrator thinks so highly of Fortunato and does not want to be responsible for what happens to him because the narrator is the one who kills him. “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could; but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge.” (Poe, 525) In the end we learn that his revenge is death. “In pace requiescat!” (Poe, 529), which means may he rest in peace. I also think the name, Fortunato, is ironic. I think of “the fortunate one” when I hear this name. However, in this case he is not so fortunate because he is killed.


                                                      Ironic???

                                  

Blog 2 - Narrators Make a Difference

The narrator of a story can make a difference. There are times an author tells a story from the outside. This is a point of view from the outside which sees the whole picture. There are also times when a story is told from a character in the story. These stories are told only through that character’s point of view. For example, the story of “The Yellow Wallpaper”. This narrator happened to have mental problems, which causes one to believe that her side of the story is inaccurate. She saw and believed things that were different from others because of her condition. 

This narrator was thought to have “temporary nervous depression-a slight hysterical tendency” (Gilman, 565) in the beginning of the story. Throughout the story her condition got worse over time. The narrator only told what was in her head instead of what reality was. Throughout the story she also stated that her point of view was different from others. In the beginning she said, “Personally, I disagree with their ideas.” (Gilman, 565) about her condition. The fact that she did not agree with others is a sign that she is an unreliable source.  

There were certain things that she said that lead to her be unreliable. “I take pains to control myself” (Gilman, 566). If the narrator had difficulty controlling herself, then she was possibly unable to control her thoughts, words, or actions at all. “I cry at nothing, and cry most of the time.” (Gilman, 568) As the story went on the narrator appeared to be changing from depressed to possibly delusional. 

The point in the story that showed when the narrator was getting worse and completely unreliable was when she fixated on the yellow wallpaper and became obsessed. “There are things in that wallpaper that nobody knows about but me, or ever will”.(Gilman, 569) She came up with all these crazy ideas about the wallpaper and believed them. She said that the pattern on the wallpaper changed at night from what it was during the day. Her conclusion was that “The faint figure behind seemed to shake the pattern, just as if she wanted to get out.” (Gilman, 570)

It is hard to trust a person when they believe a woman is trapped behind wallpaper. The end of the story showed that the narrator was in fact mentally ill, not just depressed or delusional. She locked herself in the room to help the woman out. In the end the narrator believed that she, herself, was the woman trapped in the paper. “I’ve got out at last, and I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so now you can’t put me back!” (Gilman, 574)

The author is showing that the narrator makes a big difference. Along with many other things, the narrator can change, and also create a story. If this story was told by the narrator’s husband, then it would have been about his wife getting ill and going crazy. All of the narrator’s thoughts would have been different. The narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper”, although inconsistent and inaccurate, is what made the story very different and interesting.

Blog 1 - Characters

The Things They Carried
There are 9 characters in the story. Although they were all working together as a team, they are all also different from each other. Each character chose items of their own to carry with them. These small items say so much about who the person is in the story. The characters ranged from carrying about everyone else to having no morals toward anyone.
Lieutenant Jimmy Cross was talked about the most. He was a young romantic man. He was always thinking about the woman he loved, Martha. He carried letters, pictures, and a good luck pebble, all from Martha. He cares about others, not just himself. “While Kiowa explained how Lavender died, Lieutenant Cross found himself trembling. He tried not to cry.” (O’Brien, 103) Lieutenant Cross blamed himself for the death of another.
Henry Dobbins seemed like the big, lazy, and possibly perverted type. “As a big man, therefore a machine gunner.” (O’Brien, 98) This give the impression that Henry does not run around like the others. He just stays in one spot shooting guns, so he does not need to be in shape. He carried extra canned fruit in heavy syrup. He also wore his girlfriend’s panty hose around his neck as his good luck charm.
“Dave Jensen, who practiced field hygiene, carried a toothbrush, dental floss, and several hotel-sized bars of soap.” (O’Brien, 97) He also carried extra socks, vitamins, ear plugs, empty sand bags, and a rabbits foot for good luck. He seemed to be the paranoid one of the group. He wanted to keep as healthy as possible. The rabbits foot is a sign that he worries, because it is not a symbol of anything or anyone special, just good luck.
Ted Lavender was also paranoid, but more about safety. Ted was afraid of dying. He carried extra tranquilizers and ammunition. He also carried dope with him. It was probably used to calm himself down.
Kiowa was the religious one of the group. He carried the new testament and a few items from his grandparents. He was probably the purest one in the sense that he did not have as much experience as the others. When Ted died, Kiowa seemed to be shocked about it the most, like he was in disbelief. He could not stop talking about it. Describing how Ted died, “Like cement, Kiowa whispered in the dark. I swear to God - boom, down. Not a word.” (O’Brien, 103)
Norman Bowker, Rat Kiley, and Lee Strunk seemed to be 3 average guys. They were still all different, but not a dramatic difference. Norman seemed like the quiet type that writes in his diary that he carried. Rat seemed like the smart medic that carried comic books. Lee seemed like the young preppy, pretty boy that carried a sling shot and tanning lotion.
Lastly, Mitchell Sanders was the badass character with no morals. He carried with him condoms and brass knuckles. “He put his hand on the dead boy’s wrist. He was quiet for a time, as if counting a pulse, then he patted the stomach, almost affectionately, and used Kiowa’s hunting hatchet to remove the thumb.” (O’Brien, 101)
Each of these items carried showed a part of each character in the story. The items show some personality traits, morals, values, beliefs, habits, and hobbies. There is so much to be said about a person just by the item they chose to hold. Even though everyone had the same common goal, they were still unique in their own way.